King County moves forward with body-worn cameras for deputies –


The county approved a new body-worn camera policy, however, King County’s Office of Law Enforcement Oversight said it can’t fully support it.

SEATTLE — The King County Council unanimously approved the collective bargaining agreement between the county and the King County Police Officer’s Guild. 

The county said the agreement will deploy body-worn cameras, ensure cooperation with the Office of Law Enforcement Oversight (OLEO) a…….

The county accredited A mannequin new physique-worn digital camera coverage, neverthemuch less, King County’s Office of Regulation Enstrainment Oversight said It might’t absolutely assist it.

SEATTLE — The King County Council unanimously accredited the collective bargaining settlement between the county and the King County Police Officer’s Guild. 

The county said the settlement will deploy physique-worn digital cameras, enconstructive cooperation with the Office of Regulation Enstrainment Oversight (OLEO) and enhance salaries To Make constructive the Sheriff’s office can recruit and retain deputies.

The settlement Consists of A mannequin new coverage relating to physique-worn digital cameras. The King County Sheriff’s Office (KCSO) plans To start teaching and deployment of the digital cameras Inside The primary quarter of 2023.

“The general public has been clear Inside their name for extra unbiased oversight of law enstrainment,”  said King County Councilmember Doug Upthegrove in a launch. “It is a matter of accountability and We’re delivering end outcomes.”

However, in a letter despatched to the council on Wednesday, OLEO said it believes the physique digital camera coverage is insufficient.

“We labored with the (KCSO),” said Tamer Abouzeid, OLEO director. “They requested for ideas. They accepted Lots of our ideas. It was A very collaborative course of. On The prime of the day There have been A pair of problems that have been deal breakers for us that we said We will not assist the coverage absolutely As a Outcome of of these few factors.”

In the letter, OLEO highlighted two factors it has with the coverage. The OLEO requested that, in incidents involving critical use of strain, incidents the place a group member alleges They’ve been injured or incidents the place a group member information a grievance in the direction of a deputy, officers Aren’t allowed to view docings till They’ve been interviewed. For much less critical incidents, OLEO requested that officers give A press launch earlier than They’re allowed to view physique-worn footage. 

“In both case, after a deputy is interviewed or, Inside the case of minor grievances, submits A press launch, They might view docings and, In the event that they want, append or amend their assertion,” the letter said.

OLEO additionally took problem with provisions that give deputies discretion on whether or not or To not activate their physique-worn digital cameras, For event “(w)hen There’s an articulable exigent circumstance Which might justify a (deputy’s) choice to doc or not doc.” 

OLEO said the exceptions are “too expansive and ambiguous, severely undermining completely different provisions requiring docing.” 

OLEO performed no position in negotiating the bargaining settlement. Abouzeid acknowledged It Is simple to criticize a coverage when his office doesn’t Need To imagine about value and negotiations.

In a two-yr safety plan launched earlier this yr, County Authorities Dow Constantine proposed $5 million to equip the KCSO deputies with physique digital cameras. 

OLEO assists the adoption of physique-worn digital cameras however said It is going to proceed to advocate for enhancement Inside the coverage.

“What We would like is The proper coverage,” Abouzeid said. “We’d like not examine it To A particular state or ancompletely different metropolis or county…. We now have to make it Utterly the biggest coverage We will.”